Why Curry Redux Middleware: State => Next => Action {} Vs. (state, Next) => Action {}
After reading both Redux's documentation on middleware and source code on applyMiddleware, I don't understand why middleware need the curry syntax: const logger = store => next
Solution 1:
A discussion with Dan Abramov can be found here regarding this. He said,
We could have made it (store, next) => action => () but I don't see a problem with just going all the way. You might want some configuration later, at which point options => (store, next) => action => () looks kinda arbitrary.
So no, it is not necessary to curry the parameters.
Solution 2:
No, because it a way to defer an function to be executed later. ()=>() returns a function object which only get executed later when the func obj is called.
Post a Comment for "Why Curry Redux Middleware: State => Next => Action {} Vs. (state, Next) => Action {}"